Pages Navigation Menu

The software driving your 3d printer

Repetier-Host 0.71 released

Today I released the new version 0.71 for windows and linux. The new version has two greater new changes.

Internationalization

The host can now support multiple languages. Simply select your language from the available languages and the host will change the language immediately. Unfortunately only english and german are currently available. If you like to support the project, make a translation and submit it.

Update check

To keep your host up to date, it now checks every seven days for updates. In the help menu you can also force an update check any time.

Other changes

  •   Extended EEPROM Support for Marlin (M206) – code submitted by scuba.
  •   Slic3r 0.9.2 no included.
  •   Many bug fixes.
iRapid 3d Printer and Filaments

6 Comments

  1. Hey Guys! We would love to work with you guys to create a Repetier host Solidoodle edition. Is there any way we can talk to you guys about it sometime?

    • That is no problem. The host already is configurable to some extend. All you need to do is change the custom.ini to your needs and rebundle the software package.

  2. Hey I didn’t see “Leave a Comment” under the Mac version, so I’m doing here.

    Trying to use the Rostock Max delta printer with the Mac version of Repetier 0.51 (47). I’m supposed to set the x and y home position to zero (the origin in the center). But I didn’t see how to do that in Printer Settings|Dimension. For example, I have bed width at 150 and bed left at -75, and sending G28 moves to the top center. But on the Print Panel, the X position is reported as -75, even though the hot end is centered.

    • Indeed the Mac Host has not the needed setting. The windows host has already a setting 0 for this. Will add this for the next release if I don’t forget it :-) For now you have to ignore the wrong resulting preview. The print will not be effected from this.

  3. I would defiantly like to donate some cash after using the software for some time, but you guys need to make use of quad core, threading & maybe Nvidia Cuda or GPU acceleration.

    When trying to slice a big file using high quality I can’t see a difference between my two machines yet one is a lot faster than the other.

    Hope you get that implemented.

    • We only include the slicer, we do not write it. It is in fact only part not developed by us:-) For slic3r you can define how many threads you want. Default is 2 but 4 or 8 might be faster.